SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (107578)9/18/2014 1:16:10 AM
From: Snowshoe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217523
 
>>I think we're headed back to pre-British borders in the Middle East. The English drew the borders to divide and make each protectorate easier to manipulate.<<

Those borders were drawn by the British and French during WWI. Now ISL/ISIS/IS seeks to annul...

Sykes–Picot Agreement
en.wikipedia.org

The Sykes–Picot Agreement, officially known as the Asia Minor Agreement, was a secret agreement between the governments of the United Kingdom and France,[1] with the assent of Russia, defining their proposed spheres of influence and control in the Middle East should the Triple Entente succeed in defeating the Ottoman Empire during World War I. The negotiation of the treaty occurred between November 1915 and March 1916.[2] The agreement was concluded on 16 May 1916.[3]

The agreement effectively divided the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire outside the Arabian peninsula into areas of future British and French control or influence.[4] The terms were negotiated by the French diplomat François Georges-Picot and Briton Sir Mark Sykes. The Russian Tsarist government was a minor party to the Sykes–Picot agreement, and when, following the Russian Revolution of October 1917, the Bolsheviks exposed the agreement, "the British were embarrassed, the Arabs dismayed and the Turks delighted."[5]



To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (107578)9/18/2014 2:47:27 AM
From: sense  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217523
 
All thistles are edible.

greensmoothiesblog.com



To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (107578)9/18/2014 3:13:04 AM
From: Snowshoe  Respond to of 217523
 
The ties of empire no longer bind ...

Scotland's Decision
bbc.co.uk

By Allan Little
4 September 2

We Scots, we were taught in schools, had benefited disproportionately from it; for while the English may have ruled the Empire, the Scots, for sure, had run it.

*****

In the world that my grandparents knew and understood, Scotland, like the rest of Britain, was locked into a vast global trading bloc that preferred to haul frozen lamb and butter half way round the world from New Zealand than buy the same products from neighbouring France; that imported dried fruits from Australia rather than from the countries of the Mediterranean.
It was a trading system based on protective tariffs and trade barriers known as Imperial Preference. Britain chose to trade with the old “kith and kin” territories of the English-speaking world rather than with its European neighbours.

The Empire, the powerful, binding economic force of it, had, for generations, given Britons a common purpose, an enormous shared enterprise. It gave Scottish merchants access to trade with all the continents. The city of Glasgow, before its days as an industrial powerhouse, was built on trade - sugar and tobacco in particular.


Walk along the banks of the Clyde and the ghosts of that past are written into the place names: India Quay, Jamaica Street, Durban Avenue. Pacific Quay, where BBC Scotland now has its headquarters, was once Plantation Quay, a name that recalls a past that Scotland prefers to forget - its role in the trans-Atlantic slave trade.

But by 1974 the Empire was gone. Imperial Preference was gone. When Britain joined the European Economic Community in 1973, many of its old trading partners around the world - especially Australia and New Zealand - regarded it as a betrayal. The former British dominions and colonies had to seek new markets and new trading partners, as Britain turned its face away from them to embrace a new European identity.

The Empire became the Commonwealth, a community not of real economic might but of shared memory, of common values, of fellow feeling - in essence a community of sentiment, powerful sentiment maybe, but of sentiment nonetheless.