SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David Lawrence who wrote (10741)12/15/1997 7:08:00 PM
From: jhild  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22053
 
David don't you figure they will both make an initial transitional (maybe even permanent) release that works with the old standard (e.g. x2) and the new ITU one. Then it won't matter whether it's the old one or the new standard when they dial in to the ISP. (That presupposes that there is enough memory to have both codings available.) It will more likely be a problem for simple modem to modem connections (like companies and their branch office) that will require synchronization of the changes.

But I would think it would be a major inconvenience for those that may currently be stuck with those non programmable chip sets that ROK was pumping out last March, to be able to say they were shipping. Or have they all been upgraded already?

P.S. Just another 28,000 posts to go. 3,000,000 this year for sure.



To: David Lawrence who wrote (10741)12/15/1997 9:28:00 PM
From: Dee Jay  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 22053
 
Well David, how about a rationale to buttress that thought? Is it because ROK has substantially outsold USR and LU chipsets to a much larger variety of modem makers and thus will have to contend with many more possible variants on the "proposed standard"? Since you include LU with USR it doesn't seem that an innate bias is involved in tha comment - so why do you think so?
Dee Jay