Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Bidder who wrote (4002)	12/15/1997 9:10:00 PM
From: RH	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

I don't even know where to start in dealing with your bull__t. The red ink has been well explained and is proof that the management is thinking long term rather than making a quick buck--expanding Albino for much greater production, milling capacity in future. The connections on KRY board is exactly the kind of company that the current VEN would like to hand over their resources to--do you know anything about the history of PDG and how the've got the rep of rape and pillage the resources--often screwing up deals on the way? Corruption in the government and at the lower judicial levels is exactly what the SC is concerned with. They are the ones who have been cleaning house over the last few years and they are continuing to do so now. The only claim jumpers here are PDG--suspect and stupid! Proof shown that they knew of the lack of rightful ownership but were so arrogant as to believe that their backroom deals could be steamrolled through anyway. I'm long in KRY, but would just as easily go short if I thought that's where the money was. I just can't stand reading your unsubstantiated opinions. RH

To: Michael Bidder who wrote (4002)	12/15/1997 9:14:00 PM
From: Valuepro	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10836

Micheal, Everyone is entitled to their opinion, so here's mine! Your logic is as empty as your head. KRY is successor in interest to the party who legally staked the LC 4/6 claims. The claim owners have been prevented from excerising their rights because of illegal maneuvers on the part of the Ministry of Mines and Engery (read friend of PDG). 8 of KRY's 11 claims have been upheld by the court and the other 3 are pending. These 3 matters are only related to whether or not the statute of limitations applies when an arm of the government has illegally prevented the rightful owner from solidifying their claim. That's all, and that's why so many believe this is practically a "can't lose" situation for KRY. It's Placer's history on the property which should taint them as the claim jumpers, not Crystallex. Grow up! Present some evidence/logic with your opinions or keep quite. ValuePro

===========================================================================================================================