SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The1Stockman who wrote (94252)9/24/2014 2:14:59 PM
From: John  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
Excellent points, and I fully agree with you.

Regarding your question, "why aren't millions of people out in full force marching against Washington," I think it is because the basic needs of most people are sufficiently met and that outweighs their fears of the police and military being used against them. In other words, bread, circuses and the fear of authority are outweighing the outrage they feel over politics.

Also, although people are very much against the current state of affairs of the nation's culture, society, and government, the NWO has orchestrated so much division, fear, and isolation, even among like-minded citizens, that people are simply unable to act now. Plus, communications are constantly monitored and tracked, which creates great fear, distrust, worry, and angst.

Of course, the key ingredient for sowing such seeds for the NWO is multiculturalism and diversity. Diversity and multiculturalism are the number one show-stoppers. Don't take it from me, a traditional conservative-minded fellow, take it from Robert Putnam, the Harvard far-leftist professor. He wrote a book called Bowling Alone. In a nutshell, he originally set out to show the value of diversity and multiculturalism, but he was shocked to find that diversity and multiculturalism cause human beings to withdraw to the max, like a turtle withdrawing into its shell! At least he was honest enough to publish his findings, even though it was the opposite of what he originally wanted to prove.