Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 2MAR$ who wrote (58845)	9/29/2014 2:21:24 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 69300

"Science doesn’t require that belief and it doesn’t arbitrarily rule out the existence of supernatural entities, ab initio. But the process of science limits the kind of work that scientists can do. That is, scientists — when doing science — can only work with objectively verifiable evidence. The rest — whatever it may be — is the province of theology. In other words, methodological naturalism is an operational constraint of science, not a philosophical attack on theism." Exactly. There is no evidence for flying spaghetti monsters or for a psychopathic 'Creator' who kills his children. Nor for flying horses or talking donkeys. If Science is presented with an actual talking donkey, they will no doubt examine it thoroughly and without any bias.