SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RetiredNow who wrote (146094)9/30/2014 12:48:24 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Brownback’s ‘experiment’ gone wrong

09/30/14 08:00 AM—Updated 09/30/14 10:30 AM

By Steve Benen

In June 2012, soon after approving sweeping tax cuts his state clearly couldn’t afford, Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback (R) appeared on msnbc and described his agenda in a curious way. “We’ll see how it works,” the Republican governor said. “We’ll have a real-live experiment.”

More than two years later, Kansans have had a chance to see the results of this experiment first hand – and Brownback now appears to be losing his bid for a second term.

But as Rachel noted on the show last night, among the governor’s problems is an inability to justify his failures in office. Brownback talked to PBS’s Jeff Greenfield the other day and regretted his use of the word “experiment” to describe his economic plan, conceding that people are often uncomfortable with change.

GREENFIELD: [A]bout that experiment word?

BROWNBACK: Yeah, I shouldn’t have used that word. But the good news is, it’s working well. We’re growing. We’ve got record employment in Kansas.

GREENFIELD: Then after a brief discussion with an aide.

BROWNBACK: The things we’re doing are not anything new. Going to, getting your incomes taxes down, we got nine states without an income tax. That’s not new. So nothing we’re doing is new. Now it’s new that we’re doing it but nothing that we’re doing is different than what’s done before.

Well, that’s certainly a compelling explanation, isn’t it? “Nothing we’re doing is new,” followed immediately by “it’s new that we’re doing it.” I have no idea what Brownback’s aide whispered in the governor’s ear during the interview, but it wasn’t sound rhetorical advice.

Of course, this is about more than a clumsy governor struggling to defend his record. Brownback’s more pressing concern is that his “experiment” hasn’t worked at all. As we discussed in early August, Brownback’s economic plan – slash tax rates more than the state can afford and watch a miracle unfold – has failed miserably on every possible front. The state’s bond rating was downgraded in part due to these reckless tax breaks, and soon after, Kansas suffered another downgrade.

What’s more, this isn’t the only trouble for Kansas Republicans.

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Koback (R) is still trying to force state Democrats to nominate a U.S. Senate candidate to water down the opposition for struggling incumbent Sen. Pat Roberts (R). GOP officials needed a plaintiff for a lawsuit, and relied on a Brownback aide’s dad.

It’s not going well.

A three-judge Shawnee County panel didn’t decide Monday whether Kansas Democrats should be required to fill the vacancy left when Chad Taylor dropped out of the closely contested U.S. Senate campaign against Sen. Pat Roberts, a three-term Republican.

The court challenge seeking to force Democrats to fill the vacancy hit a stumbling block Monday when David Orel, the man who filed the suit, failed to show up for his day in court.


It’s almost as if Republicans found a half-hearted litigant who isn’t fully committed to his own case.

With time running out and Kansas election officials needing to print ballots, this should be resolved within a day or two. Odds are, Koback, who’s helping oversee the elections process while also serving as a member of Pat Roberts’ re-election team, will be disappointed by the outcome.



To: RetiredNow who wrote (146094)9/30/2014 12:51:19 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Now, we know that nothing has changed since 2009. All the root causes are still there, only bigger.

That's not true at all. It was primarily real estate that caused the big crash in 2008.............and bank lending and real estate practices have been ratcheted back. We are not seeing the crazy loans, the poor business practices and the uniquely wrapped derivatives.