Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John F. Dowd who wrote (14929)	12/15/1997 11:17:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24154

Or perhaps you're a hotheaded Microsuckup, John. Who cares what Microsoft said in their conference call? Why is it any more relevant than O.J. and him saying he wouldn't rest till he found the real killer? If Microsoft has a legal point to make, the proper avenue to make that point is through the courts. If you want to discuss the law as you think it should be, maybe you can look up the local antitrust expert, I'm sure you'd find his opinions agreeable. I learned my lesson on that count. of course, on technical matters where I actually know something, I'm always being told it doesn't matter. But in the antitrust matter, suddenly all the Microphiles are just the final word on all technical issues involved, and legal issues too, and the judge is just a fool to have the timerity to question Microsoft's self-defined Orwellian interpretation of computer technology and contractual issues. As I've said in the past, tell it to the judge. Or the next one up the line. We all live under the law, and you guys don't get to decide that antipiracy laws are important but antitrust laws aren't. Of course, badmouthing judges and the legal system in general usually isn't very effective on the next judge up the line, but maybe it'll work this time. CHeers, Dan.