SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (25457)12/15/1997 11:57:00 PM
From: Estimated Prophet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
SB

<<did they explain how it is good business to spend $5 a share on equipment for 16 mb dram to earn $1.07?>>

remember the guy who held a quiz on this thread a while back...the question was introduced by a statement to the effect of "mu will not spend 7.50 to make 1.00"??

to my recollection, after a bunch of hints and a lot of wasted time reading everybody's guesses, there never was an answer. could that be because there wasn't one?

your question reminds of that "quiz"---can you explain the answer?;-)

brian wright



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (25457)12/16/1997 12:15:00 PM
From: Ed Beers  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
Skeeter, I think that Micron's ASP will be dominated by SDRAM. EDO
pricing has been pressuring SDRAM pricing but, given a general
consensus that EDO pricing in now below marginal production costs, I
don't expect this to continue after inventories have been reduced.

The $5 dollars to earn $1 is easy. Don't forget that depreciation
is not a real current expense. It is an accounting fiction to show
that you have to pay off the $5. MU has been making a profit after
depreciation. Now you could argue that the depreciation schedule for
semiconductor equipment (specified by the IRS) is to long and causes
depreciation to be understated. You might also take issue with not
depreciating Lehi since it is not in service. I don't think it is
fair to say that equipement costs are being ignored.

Ed