Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael d kugler who wrote (27905)	12/16/1997 1:04:00 AM
From: MY OPINION	Respond to of 55532

<ROTFLMAO> DRINK SOME MORE VODKA, COMRADE!

To: michael d kugler who wrote (27905)	12/16/1997 1:05:00 AM
From: David R	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

maybe, but Mrok appears to have much stronger motivation than he publically admits. Appears is the key word.

To: michael d kugler who wrote (27905)	12/16/1997 1:06:00 AM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

2. Riley G recommends that all shareholders take physical delivery of their stock certificates. When delivery of stock certificates is demanded by a significant number of shareholders, the creators of nonexistent stock will be forced to clear the market of the extra shares that they flooded in to the market. We are not talking about legal shorting; we are talking about the selling of nonexistent shares. Thus keeping the price of a stock down in attempts to terminal short it. If a terminal short is made (stock value = $0) then the short sellers never have to worry about coving the extra shares that they flooded the market with. This is why every shareholder must demand delivery of their certificates!

To: michael d kugler who wrote (27905)	12/16/1997 1:07:00 AM
From: Kurt N	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

I think the whole lawsuit mess boils down to who is more credible. A is sueing B, etc. So far Mork is the least credible out of anybody. BTW: Just wondering, did you ever get served in a lawsuit? Hope you don't, since your credibility has been shot to h*ll over and over. Imagine a broker soliciting over the internet. I'm sure that will go over real well. Kurt

To: michael d kugler who wrote (27905)	12/16/1997 1:09:00 AM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

3. Riley G states for the record, ''I am only a shareholder of RMIL stock and have no direct or indirect ties or links to Rocky Mountain International, LTD. (RMIL). I am also sick and tired of the short sellers and their associates on the Internet with their repeated attacks on other RMIL shareholders and myself, as they continue to slander a company that I am a shareholder of. It appears that the short sellers' main intent is to manipulate the price of RMIL down in an attempt to cause shareholders to sell off their shares for the personal gain and benefit of the short sellers.''