Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mike iles who wrote (25541)	12/16/1997 11:40:00 AM
From: Thomas G. Busillo	Respond to of 53903

Mike, I hear you. Unfortunately, sometimes prosecuting a war involves fighting on the terms of the opposition. So if the Kurlak defense team calls him "an honest broker", I must believe that when Tom Kurlak has an "accumulate" recommendation, he, being an "honest broker" actually means "I really do want my clients to accumulate (real world definition)". Having your clients accumulate long-term from the mid-50's to 22 1/8, doesn't go a long way in proving the "best there is argument" does it? Of course, I also neglected to ask the following: If Kurlak's price target on MU was 55-60, and "the reason" he turned on MU was that fact that it had reached his price target, then why was the long-term rating at a 2 all the way down to 22 1/8? Or does this downgrade represent the "long-term" part of Tom Kurlak turning tail and running 38 points too late? Good trading, Tom