Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (14964)	12/16/1997 10:44:00 AM
From: John F. Dowd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24154

Dear Sir: To assist you in your quest for truth and right thinking attached below, in plain language, is the crux of the matter. You are correct that I am on the side of MSFT and private property guarantees. What have I added you ask? A voice of reason I say. It is odd that you never address the points but come flying back to the forum with references to OF and Johnny Cochrane. If you would like to discuss that perhaps we could find a large area of agreement. Anyway here is a good synopsis of the MSFT position: ATTACHMENT: Microsoft on Monday announced that it will appeal the preliminary injunction issued last week by a federal court. At a news conference today, Microsoft's general counsel Bill Neukom said that Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson made "numerous serious errors" in issuing the injunction, which ordered Microsoft to stop requiring PC makers to include Internet Explorer on their Windows 95 machines. One of the judge's errors, according to Neukom, was to unilaterally expand the case outside the bounds of the Department of Justice's petition. That petition, filed in October, asked the court to hold Microsoft in contempt of the 1995 consent decree that forbade it from leveraging its operating system monopoly into other application areas. As Neukom describes it: "The government has to prove contempt by clear and convincing evidence of a violation of a clear and unambiguous term of the consent decree. The government was unable to do that to the satisfaction of the judge, and accordingly the judge denied the government's petition for contempt. However, the court proceeded on its own initiative to treat the case as thought it was something more, a case brought under the Sherman Act for tying violations." Microsoft said it filed the appeal this morning in the federal court of appeals for the District of Columbia circuit. The company said the court will appoint a three-judge panel to hear the matter. No hearing dates have been set yet, but Microsoft said it has asked for an expeditious hearing. In the meantime, the company said it will comply with the preliminary injunction, and today it outlined its strategy for doing so. Microsoft VP Brad Chase said the company has sent a letter to every PC maker that licenses Windows 95 informing them that they can continue to ship the full Windows 95 product, including IE3; ship Windows 95 but remove all IE-related files; or ship the original August 1995 Windows 95a retail release with Internet Explorer version 1. Chase pointed out that removing IE3 from Windows 95 leaves something to be desired: "Unfortunately, when you take out all of those files, you're left with a version of Windows 95 that doesn't boot." Microsoft said PC makers can safely remove IE1 without breaking other operating system features. Today's announcement does little to clear up questions about the injunction's impact on Windows 98; Microsoft shipped the third beta of Windows 98 to testers on Monday. The judge's order said the injunction applies to "any Microsoft personal computer operating system ... including Windows 95 or any successor version." But Chase said the company nonetheless is moving full steam ahead on Windows 98. "The implication of this for Windows 98 is not something we've figured out completely ... but we're moving forward with Windows 98 for a Q2 release." A spokesperson for the U.S. Department of Justice said the government is still reviewing Microsoft's appeal and had no comment by news time today.