Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gerald R. Lampton who wrote (14965)	12/16/1997 10:50:00 AM
From: John F. Dowd	Respond to of 24154

Who are you, Robespierre? Only those who can understand pseudo intellectual drivvle need invest in MSFT- what a fatuous proposal. On the contrary that is exactly who doesn't as the forum so nicely discloses. QED.

To: Gerald R. Lampton who wrote (14965)	12/16/1997 11:12:00 AM
From: Reginald Middleton	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 24154

It appears as if MSFT has a pretty good point with the judge unilaterally expanding the scope of the hearing outside that of the plaintiff's actual motion/petition. This seems especially significant given the fact that the defendant as not given an oppurtunity to rebutt, respond, or reply prior to the judges order. MSFT's argument seems even stronger given the fact that we have not heard a peep out of the DOJ concerning their opinion on the matter. What is your opinion?