Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: go4it who wrote (29290)	12/16/1997 1:21:00 PM
From: Robert J Mullenbach	Respond to of 35569

biz.yahoo.com This is far from over, I never sold , still in for the long term, I sure dont know all the answers, I am keeping a open mind to this investment. IPMCF owns 13.5 % of outstanding stock

To: go4it who wrote (29290)	12/16/1997 1:57:00 PM
From: Ed Devlin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Chuck, I agree with you on the Pt situation and that Au is a prisoner. I certainly agree that the future of the dirts will be massive production and downward price pressure. My concern with platinum is just for that reason: it's the PGMs which will make the DDs, not gold alone. If the Pt price is to be stable and economic, it will depend on industrial commodity concerns. My feeling is that when the price comes down, there will be a strong growth in long-term industrial applications of PGMs AND of Au as well. Both Pt and Au have wonderful properties. I would certainly welcome prices of both being dependent on "real world" utilization rather than manipulable "store-of-value" in the clutches of mega-movers and Central Banks. Fabulous pin connectors make better sense to me than ECU maneuvers. Am I taking too short a view?? Best, Ed