To: zbyslaw owczarczyk who wrote (766 ) 12/16/1997 2:42:00 PM From: Maverick Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1629
ITU modem std, part II Modem prices have been declining so rapidly that it's taken the profit out of the business," said Will Strauss, an analyst at Forward Concepts Inc., in Tempe, Ariz. "They need to come out with a standard so [vendors] have an excuse to bring prices back up again." Even 3Com, whose x2 technology is not represented as strongly as K56Flex in the standard proposal, is happy with the progress. "We're pleased that we can move forward," said Neil Clemmons, vice president of marketing at 3Com's personal communications division, in Skokie, Ill. Officials from Rockwell, not surprisingly, were thrilled. "It's terrific; [several] issues have been resolved in favor of the Flex camp," said Vijay Parikh, vice president and general manager of the personal computing division at Rockwell, in Newport Beach, Ore. "We're delighted by this particular decision." Some vendors caution that work toward the standard is far from over. "All the major obstacles have been removed, but there are still some subtle issues," said Bahman Barazesh, technical manager for modem products at Lucent, in Middletown, N.J. "We have a good chance to settle this thing, but there is still work to be done." A standard for the new year would be good news for ISPs (Internet service providers). "As an ISP, I've held off putting in 56K because of the incompatible [technologies]," said Glenn Schimmelpfennig, president of Gatekeepers Internet Access, in Salt Lake City. "Now I'll put it in probably in February. "I've been thinking for months that it would be nice if the modem manufacturers would put aside their egos and come up with one," Schimmelpfennig said. "It's good for the end user. Everyone will be able to talk to each other, and this should move the industry forward."