Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: locogringo who wrote (815328)	11/4/2014 4:57:51 PM
From: FJB	1 Recommendation Recommended By locogringo Respond to of 1578552

Election Eve “Fast & Furious” Document Dump by Justice Dept. Sharyl Attkisson It could be the ultimate Washington “document dump.” Instead of turning over a heap of potentially damaging documents to Congress on the usual Friday afternoon as government agencies tend to do in the hope of attracting as little media attention as possible, the Justice Department turned over a massive set of documents on election eve. The 64,280 pages of documents had previously been withheld under President Obama’s one and only claim of executive privilege of his presidency. The privilege was invoked after Attorney General Eric Holder refused to turn the documents over under Congressional subpoena and was held in contempt of Congress in June 2012. Republicans in the House of Representative subsequently sued to obtain the materials, as did the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch. Last night’s handover was in response to an order from a federal judge in the case. The House Oversight Committee, which issued the original subpoena, said that the newly-disclosed material covers about two-thirds of the documents withheld. A significant set of documents remains protected under executive privilege. Read the Justice Dept. cover letter with the document production “Since these pages still do not represent the entire universe of the documents the House of Representatives is seeking related to the Justice Department’s cover-up of the botched gun-walking scandal that contributed to the death of a Border Patrol agent, our court case will continue,” said Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) in a statement. “I am deeply concerned that some redactions to these documents may still be inappropriate and contrary to the judge’s order in the case”.–Rep. Issa In its separate lawsuit, Judicial Watch obtained, under court order, a list of withheld documents. They included emails between Holder and his mother, and Holder and his wife. Additionally, they included emails discussing my Fast and Furious Freedom of Information Act requests and my news reports on the top sharylattkisson.com

To: locogringo who wrote (815328)	11/4/2014 5:12:27 PM
From: FJB	1 Recommendation Recommended By locogringo Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578552

“Our Friends,” the Saudis Power Line by Steven Hayward While we gear up for a long day and evening tracking election returns, we should update our story from three weeks ago entitled “ What Are the Saudis Up To?”There I wondered about the Saudi decision to maintain current production levels in the face of falling oil prices: But could there be a more sinister reason? If oil prices keep falling, it will not only hurt some of the Saudis’ OPEC partners who have high production costs and big requirements for oil revenues to fund their governments (especially Venezuela and Iran), but it could put the squeeze on American producers, perhaps even leading to a domestic oil crash as happened in Texas and Oklahoma in the mid-1980s. “Our friends, the Saudis” wouldn’t do that, would they? This morning the Wall Street Journal reports the following: Oil prices tumbled to their lowest point in more than two years after Saudi Arabia unexpectedly cut prices for crude sold to the U.S., likely paving the way for further declines and adding to pressure on American energy producers. Okay, so they’re preserving market share perhaps. But read on to this bit: Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia raised the prices for its oil in other locations, including Asia, where the country had cut its prices for four consecutive months. Market watchers had expected the Saudis to either cut prices in every major region, suggesting an intention to compete for buyers, or to raise prices across the board. Asia has been an especially competitive market for exporters in recent months, so the focus on maintaining market share in the U.S. was surprising to traders, some of whom interpreted the action as taking aim at U.S. shale-oil production rather than being driven by supply and demand. (Emphasis added.) So “our friends, the Saudis” are only cutting prices for the U.S., eh. Good for motorists and consumers here, of course. But if Saudi Arabia (and OPEC generally) were a domestic corporation, it would be vulnerable to antitrust prosecution for predatory pricing. To be sure, “predatory pricing” is a dubious economic doctrine—except in a geopolitical context. If the Saudis were really our political allies, they’d be doing just the opposite, and cutting prices to customers for Russian, Iranian, and Venezuelan oil. This is what happens when you have a president that foreign nations easily hold in contempt. Maybe we should crash the global market for the Saudis, by opening up our strategic petroleum reserve, fast-tracking the Keystone pipeline, and announcing the opening of large amounts of federal land for rapid development and production. But that would also require a president with . . . well, you know the rest.