SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (816746)11/10/2014 3:33:29 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1584530
 
Stanford Climate Scientists.

Isn't that an oxymoron?



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (816746)11/10/2014 4:16:07 PM
From: one_less2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Broken_Clock
gamesmistress

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1584530
 
Other than enriching Al Gore, what have we accomplished? What have we accomplished with the Governmental interventions on drugs for that matter ... at 25 billion a year?

"In support of the 2014 National Drug Control Strategy (Strategy), the President requests $25.4 billion in Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 to reduce drug use and its consequences in the United States. "

whitehouse.gov

I bet you could build a dandy satellite based climate intervention system over California for 25 billion a year.

Rainmaker Rainmaker, play me a soulful tune.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (816746)11/10/2014 5:10:02 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brumar89
locogringo
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1584530
 
Without intervention, this extreme pace could lead to a 5-6 degree Celsius spike in annual temperatures by the end of the century.

ABSOLUTE NONSENSE........... we have not observed any measurable warming in the last 18 years.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (816746)11/11/2014 1:43:41 PM
From: Tenchusatsu1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Brumar89

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1584530
 
WR, maybe you and the Stanford scientists can tell us what should be the ideal rate of "climate change" and how we could achieve that.

Just the fact that there are almost 7 billion people on Earth is going to have an impact on the climate.

This is just a repeat of the "population bomb" studies done in the 70's, except instead of running out of food, we're supposed to be running out of environment.

Been there, done that, samo samo.

Tenchusatsu