Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (62724)	11/14/2014 7:51:39 PM
From: TigerPaw	1 Recommendation Recommended By 2MAR$ Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

if there are no pollutants? Coal has lots and lots of dirt within it. It's not diamonds or some other pure form of carbon. The pollution from coal goes way beyond just CO2. Natural gas can be purified to mostly methane which burns to CO2 and H2O. It does not produce the tons of acid and mercury like a coal fire does.

To: Greg or e who wrote (62724)	11/15/2014 1:40:44 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 69300

You're a MORON. You think you know more than the educated community. In fact... you know NOTHING about climate change science. But the internet allows morons like you to shoot off your mouths about everything from fission to fusion to the complexities of climate. Is it a coincidence that superstitious FUNDIES are also the people on the internet who challenge everything discovered by Science?? I THINK NOT!!! Ummmm...the earth is 6000 years old. Umm....Adam named all the animals. Ummm...some donkeys can talk. Ummmm...dinosaurs were created the same week as humans! Ummm...Yabber changed physics after the "flood" so that light would refract and make rainbows (covenant rainbows)! *Ummmm......*