Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (71006)	11/16/2014 1:54:03 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

>> It has for near to 50 years now... (maybe even longer, I don't have the historical chops to go further.) As previously stated, never in the context of a law raising 100s of billions of dollars. That is not "incidental," and the Court certainly shouldn't hold that it is. And we currently have a split in the 5th & 9th circuits which will persist after the 9th Circuit rules en banc. At the very least it is going to pose a meaningful threat to the law, although a year or two off.