SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rocky Reid who wrote (40185)12/16/1997 4:53:00 PM
From: Cogito  Respond to of 58324
 
>>The hard facts are, rumors are circulating . . .<

Rocky -

You tell 'em, kid.

BTW, the rumor circles you cite as having been correct before the end of the last quarter were saying that Iomega would miss their numbers. They didn't. Another of your predictions proven false. As this latest one will be.

- Allen



To: Rocky Reid who wrote (40185)12/16/1997 5:15:00 PM
From: CASEY  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
I fully understand NOW...

Lets see INTC was down 15/16. That stock is sure to sink to the low 50's by the end the week. A strong tech sector... I think not, just a number of totally battered stocks getting back some big losses of past weeks.

You know there is know only one reason I would like to see IOM take off again even then making more money on this stock... to see Rocky hide beneath what ever ROCK he lives under for good.

It's been raining alot in N.Cal. so the worms do seem to come out then. Go away Rocky and go annoy another thread.



To: Rocky Reid who wrote (40185)12/16/1997 5:57:00 PM
From: Linda Pearson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
RR, you said re: the rumors from your broker friend: <This is why IOM stock went down today, and why it did not participate in the success most other tech stocks enjoyed during the day's market action. >

Did you read my post? Don't you think a mention of Insider Selling coinciding with the drop today may have some associative properties?

Message 2980447

Linda