SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Magnetics Corp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dave Chanoux who wrote (11030)12/16/1997 7:53:00 PM
From: Don Earl  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12298
 
Hi Dave,

<As usual, I don't believe any of it.>

It is sort of hard to imagine that the Anals have suddenly decided that there is going to be $28,000,000 less this quarter than there was a week ago with no news. According to the company there will be 35% less revenue than last quarter 123,000,000 X 65% = 80,000,000. Even if gross margins dropped to 20%-25% and the company did nothing to reduce operating expenses from last quarter, they would still have income from operations before the one time charge that we already know about. The one time restructuring and bad debt of $12,000,000 would come to (.50) even without any kind of tax break. To come up with an additional (.28) they would have to loose another $7,000,000 from operations.

An estimate of (.78) is ridiculous and of course it's timed just right to kill a technical rebound. Looks like it's time for some e-mail to the SEC.

Regards,

Don



To: Dave Chanoux who wrote (11030)12/17/1997 3:25:00 AM
From: Jonathan Bird  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12298
 
Loss per share should be based on the 23 million outstanding shares (approximatley) rather than the 31 million fully diluted shares.

Dave,
I know that First Call always gives its estimates on a fully diluted basis. And i know when APM reports earnings they always give the fully diluted results as a factor of 31 mil shares. So am I misunderstanding something or are Todd's figures correct?

Jon Bird