Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sandeep who wrote (65996)	11/20/2014 1:27:52 PM
From: Brian Sullivan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218290

Not very rational: If we applied the long-run annualized return for stocks (8%) to the pre-crisis highs of 1,576 on the S&P 500, we get 2,917 by the end of next year,

To: sandeep who wrote (65996)	11/20/2014 1:28:27 PM
From: Fintas	1 Recommendation Recommended By toccodolce Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218290

I want you and others to think about what you just presented re what another wrote. A RATIONAL case for 45% in 2015 45%!!!!!!! That's RATIONAL? I didn't read the article. I don't read fantasy. There isn't ANYTHING RATIONAL about a 45% move off the upside that has been seen. But YA might want to show that post to those who are suggesting to 2500 SPX without a 200 point retrace i.e MYTH MAN.. DA CHIEF.. PAY IT FORWARD.. RARE BIRD...and what did you say on that one?. DID you agree with MYTH MAN or did you step back and leave him hanging? Smile If applied to SPX 2050 that's a 900 points plus and it appears someone wants to push DOWN 12k or SPX 2916.. BUT in 2015.. I strongly disagree. BOTTOM Line 20% from 2050 to 2500 was silly. Suggesting 45% from 2050 and over 2900 is not objective. 45% is not objective whether DOW or SPX. BUT you are entitled to your view and are welcome to buy. Fintas