SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : GOLD-XAU -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (668)12/16/1997 6:42:00 PM
From: PaulM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1756
 
Hello O'49er. It's my understanding an increase in the "monetary base" (M-3) does not necessarily work its way through the system to become M-1 or M-2, and therefore doesn't necessarily result in what most would think of as "inflation." The market, not the FED, will determine M-1 and M-2.

For a while now, we've had M-3 moving along at a nice clip, but M-1 actually decreasing. Some argue that's a classic sign of deflation (even depression). The FED is getting less bang for its inflationary buck.

At the same time, M-2 does suggest there should be more inflation than official govt stats currently suggest.

The 11% increase in M-3 is clearly out of the ordinary however and must somehow be related to Asia. Expect to see much, much more of the same.



To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (668)12/18/1997 5:11:00 PM
From: Bill Grant  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1756
 
O/49r, Paul

Here are two more URLs from that series that give a longer timeframe, though only back to 1980. These charts show RATE of growth contrasted with growth in $bil in URL Paul cited.

stls.frb.org
stls.frb.org

Regards,
Bill