Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 2MAR$ who wrote (63141)	11/21/2014 9:52:38 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 69300

Another Massive Fail By James Hansen Posted on November 21, 2014 by stevengoddard In 1986, Hansen predicted a large increase in hot days in Washington DC Last month, a Government scientist predicted that the number of days here on which the maximum tempertaure exceeds 100 degrees might just climb from one day a year, on average, to 12 days a year by the year 2050, and that the number of nights in which the temperature does not fall below 80 degrees might leap from one a year to 19. The scientist, Dr. James E. Hansen, a climatologist at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, describing a study of the global phenomenon of ”the greenhouse effect,” told a Senate subcommittee that such temperature changes ”may significantly affect the climactic environment for the general population.” TURN UP THAT AIR-CONDITIONER AND READ THIS – NYTimes.com The exact opposite has happened. The have only been three days over 100 degrees this century.

To: 2MAR$ who wrote (63141)	11/22/2014 5:09:07 AM
From: Solon	Respond to of 69300

We all need to burn more coal. Look how well it is working for China? :-( Will China ever get its pollution problem under control? By Brad Plumer March 11, 2013 Earlier this year, when Beijing was choking on record levels of smog, observers wondered whether China would ever get its pollution problem under control. It's an insanely difficult question, with huge implications for everything from climate change to the global economy. Cloudy forecasts. (AP) So here's one stab at an answer, in the form of a big recent analysis (pdf) from three Deutsche Bank economists. The bad news: Most of China's current attempts to curb pollution are failing badly — the country is on pace for ever-higher levels of smog that could throttle the nation's economy and trigger out-of-control protests. But there are reasons for optimism here, too: It's still technically possible for China to get a handle on its smog problem without abandoning economic growth. The country will just have to revamp its energy and transportation policies entirely. Starting... now. Let's start with the gloom. China's air quality is already dismal, thanks to an ever-growing number of coal-fired power plants, factories and automobiles. The annual average levels of small particulate pollution, PM2.5, in cities is at 75 micrograms per cubic meter, three times as high as what the World Health Organization considers safe. (And that's an average — in January, Beijing's pollution levels soared past 900 µg/m3.) And the future outlook isn't any better. The Deutsche Bank economists, Jun Ma, Audrey Shi and Michael Tong, take a look at China's current policies to curtail coal use, promote denser cities, and bolster mass transit. They found that these policies will still leave China with pollution that's 70 percent higher by 2025: Among other things, the analysts don't believe that China's current and much-hyped pledge to restrict coal consumption to 3.9 billion tons by 2015 will actually work. "[T]his limit will likely be breached in as early as 2013, according to forecasts of many analysts. We see nothing in the current policy that could meaningfully slow down the pace of coal consumption," they write. That's not good news for China. Higher levels of smog and particulate pollution have been linked to respiratory illnesses, strokes, heart attacks, and death. Anti-pollution protests are spreading across that country. One study from Peking University's School of Public health estimated that elevated levels of PM2.5 cost China some $1 billion over the past year. It's starting to put a dent in the country's economy. "Under these pressures," the authors note, "we believe the government will have no choice but to take more drastic actions to fight air pollution." So what will "more drastic actions" look like? Here are five big proposals from the report, summarized: 1) Reduce the annual growth in coal from its current rate of 4 percent to 2 percent. Coal use should peak by 2017. (Current projections have coal use peaking in the 2030s.) 2) Adopt scrubbers and other technologies that reduce conventional pollutants from coal-fired power plants 70 percent in the next 18 years. Similar technologies and better fuel efficiency can reduce emissions from vehicles by 80 percent over that time frame. 3) Increase the growth rate for lower-carbon energy technologies, from gas and nuclear to wind and hydro and solar power by 4 percentage points. 4) Slow the number of cars on the road — the 2030 target should be 250 million passenger cars, not the current 400 million. 5) More rails and subways. A lot more, in fact. There's a lot more detail in the report, but the analysts estimate that if China does all this, it can reduce maximum annual average levels of PM2.5 down to about 35 micrograms per cubic meter by 2030. That's still higher than the World Health Organization's recommendations, and it's about twice as high as pollution levels in U.S. cities. But it would count as considerable progress. So how hard would it be for China to revamp its energy and transportation policies? That's the good news: The Deutsche Bank authors estimate that the country could curtail coal use, clean up its energy supply, and still grow at an average of 6.8 percent per year between 2013 and 2030. In particular, they argue that the United Kingdom went through an analogous structural shift in the 1950s after the "Great Smog" in London that killed 12,000 people. Britain had a similarly coal-dependent economy back then, but it managed to diversify its energy supply and clean up pollution without hurting growth: