SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bobby Yellin who wrote (4347)12/16/1997 6:39:00 PM
From: goldsnow  Respond to of 116756
 
History lesson, who to blame

BUSINESS INSIDER -- Will Corporate America Start Blaming Everything on
Asia?
Also, a reality check on E*Trade's IPO claims
Herb Greenberg

On its conference call with analysts late Monday, Oracle President Ray
Lane made it perfectly clear that while a slowdown in some parts of its
business are just blips, troubles related to turmoil in Asia are
serious.

Oracle's blame-it-on-Asia explanation follows a similar blame-it-on-Asia
earnings warning last week from 3Com.

Asia clearly is a growing problem for many companies, including many in
Silicon Valley with large exports to Asia. But Oracle and 3Com had other
troubles as well.

Oracle has been struggling with a slowdown in U.S. sales of its
principal relational database product. Its stock tumbled 29 percent
yesterday on disappointing second-quarter earnings.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Gate gives you the business at Business & Finance.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Back in March I pointed out a host of problems in a column that
questioned whether Oracle's ''life in the fast lane'' was about to
slow.) And 3Com has been trying to unstuff the clogged distribution
channel it inherited when it acquired U.S. Robotics.

That raises the next obvious question (at least to yours truly): How
many companies will start using Asia as the scapegoat for all their
earnings embarrassments? We won't know until after the fact. But back in
the days of the Gulf War, many companies with little relationship to the
Middle East blamed their troubles on the war. Asia isn't likely to be
any different. But it doesn't matter because Wall Street doesn't really
care what causes earnings disappointments.

SHORT POSITIONS

-- Speaking of Oracle: Back in March Oracle looked like a disaster
waiting to happen. Despite its lovefest with Wall Street, the company
had a tough time meeting analysts' estimates for several quarters.
Josephthal analyst Bert Hochfeld was among the few analysts who were
skeptical about the company's growth potential, saying at the time that
database software prices were falling to ''commodity'' levels.

Oracle insisted it didn't have any troubles. Then rival Informix ran
into trouble, and even Hochfeld turned bullish, saying, ''If your
largest competitor has blown up, then not even the dimmest among us can
say that's a bad thing for Oracle.''

In recent months, though, he once again became an Oracle bear. The
reason is simple: he says the relational database business -- Oracle's
bread and butter -- ''is at the end of its life'' as a growth vehicle.

-- Numbers, please: Remember those deals E*Trade and Charles Schwab were
striking a few months ago with investment bankers to give their
customers access to initial public offerings?

Yesterday, Palo Alto-based E*Trade issued a press release bragging that
it had sold all of the shares it was allocated by Robertson Stephens in
last month's IPO of Sportsline USA, an Internet sports information
service.

E*Trade CEO Christos Cotsakos was quoted as saying that ''the great
amount of enthusiasm E*Trade customers showed for this offering is proof
positive of just how interested independent investors are'' in IPOs.

Now, for a reality check: Only about 125 of E*Trade's customers were
eligible to buy the Sportsline IPO. To get in on the deal, they had to
meet certain requirements imposed by E*Trade, the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the National Association of Securities Dealers.
Of the customers who wanted the shares, only about 70 actually got them.

And according to E*Trade and Robertson Stephens, E*Trade only had access
to a measly 75,000 shares of the 3.5 million that were offered. E*Trade
says this was just a pilot program, but it shows that despite the hype,
individuals hoping to get in on the ground floor of a hot deal may get a
cool reception.

-- Statistically speaking: Money manager Eric Von der Porten, of Leeward
Investments in San Carlos, observes that if the Dow closes above 7,669
this year it will be only the second time since at least 1918 -- as far
back as he has data -- that the Dow will have doubled in three years.

The first time was between 1933 and 1935, when the market was recovering
from the 1929 crash.

''Market bulls will undoubtedly point out that this rapid run-up was
followed by an additional 25 percent gain in 1936,'' Von der Porten
says. However, the exuberance ended in 1937, with a 33 percent pullback
that wiped out the 1936 gains -- and then some.

''I ain't no market timer,'' Von der Porten says, ''but it's interesting
to observe and speculate.''