Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Electronics (MUEI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Timothy W Adams who wrote (2672)	12/16/1997 11:15:00 PM
From: Harold S.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4074

It seems to me that there are just too many reasons for this stock to go up and not a whole lot of reasons for it to go down from here. This may be a primitive analysis but taking a look at revenue and eps comparisons for the year ending 94 vs. the current period we can see the following. REVENUES (Thousands of U.S. Dollars) QUARTERS 1994 1995 1996 1997 NOV 75,656 134,329 438,578 421,018 FEB 96,729 190,225 456,619 510,274 MAY 106,249 271,477 412,322 511,394 AUG 134,304 403,968 457,401 513,097 TOTAL 412,938 999,999 1,764,920 1,955,783 Please note that total revenues for the quarter ending August 1994 were app. 412 K v. just under 2 MILLION for the quarter ending Aug. 97. I agree this quarter puts a damper on the way this year starts, but come on, the stock price was 9 dollars back in 1994 when the co. only had 412K in revenue!!! Please someone give me a good arguement as to why this company isn't either going up on its own or in the serious running to be taken over!! I am loading the boat on this baby tomorrow...look how many times this stock has gone from 9 to 24 and back again in the last 3 years!!! Good luck to all.

To: Timothy W Adams who wrote (2672)	12/17/1997 11:32:00 AM
From: Larry Brew	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4074

Timothy, << flat panel tv's >> Flat panel displays have 2 problems as I understand it. Correct me if wrong. 1) Viewing angle is not wide unless the photoelectro- luminescence approach is used. I believe the above terminology is correct, but I can verify it if necessary. 2) The problem with the above solution is that RGB can not produce blue luminescence with this technology. Blue is makeshift. A little known venture capitalist company in Canada called Westaim has claimed to developed an inexpensive blue photoelectroluminescence process. It's my understanding this could be a solution to tv's flat panel future. Any flat panel Gurus out there with comments? I'm about primed to double up on MUEI if I can sort this flat panel thing out soon enough. Larry