Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (819544)	11/28/2014 1:56:24 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1586342

>> As a consequence, neither in this country nor in England has the suspect under investigation by the grand jury ever been thought to have a right to testify or to have exculpatory evidence presented. Scalia's comment was precisely correct. The prosecutor makes those decisions. You evidently don't understand the meaning of the term "right", or how a grand jury operates at all. Perhaps it is a little too abstract for you. But the "right" to testify comes in to play ONLY if Wilson wanted to testify but was not allowed to do so. The prosecutor makes that call; the prosecutor can put on all evidence or none. It is up to him. Period. This is one of those things that, since it doesn't align with your ideological beliefs, you'll never understand it. Neither will CJ or tejek. Because for you, partisanship is more important that justice.