Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : BAY Ntwks (under House) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gs who wrote (3211)	12/16/1997 8:40:00 PM
From: Daveyk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6980

Garri,With your permission I'd like to post your e-mail response from Bay on the Motley Fool Bay thread unless of course you'd like to do it yourself.Let me know your decision.Thanks for your effort! Regards,Dave

To: gs who wrote (3211)	12/16/1997 9:32:00 PM
From: Ron Kline	Respond to of 6980

Curious how the M. Fools played out the COMS story when it tanked. Since it is in their portfolio I bet they downplayed it and said nothing about secret meetings with analysts. I think they don't realize that they can move stocks up and down, and they should be careful to not make a commentary out of the news. They should write a story as if they owned the shares themselves which they obviously didn't. Greenberg in the San Francisco chronicle is probably worse, he does this on a daily basis. It's no doubt he will write up slanted news stories on a stock of mine only to find out later he never really broke a story, just caused temporary panic. I used to sell on this stuff and learned from my mistakes. They then go back up once the news clears, and you realize that these guys know very little. Seems to me like a bunch of big egos out there.