Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (819802)	11/29/2014 7:30:27 PM
From: joseffy	1 Recommendation Recommended By locogringo Respond to of 1586545

Apparently, Marxism and its usage is very important to left wingers. Maybe that's why hearing so many mentions of the US Constitution these days has them so upset.

To: tejek who wrote (819802)

11/29/2014 7:41:15 PM

From: joseffy

2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
Taro

Respond to of 1586545

White Teen Killed by Black Cop and Black Teen Killed by White Cop and Media Preferences

.............................................................................................
Last Days Watchman ^ | Julio Severo

Two years ago an unarmed white teen was killed by a black police officer and his death drew no media attention and no national and international protests.

Violent Ferguson protests

According to the Washington Times, Gilbert Collar, a white, unarmed 18-year-old man under the influence of drugs, was shot and killed October 6, 2012, by Officer Trevis Austin, who is black, in Mobile, Alabama. Despite public pressure for an indictment, a Mobile County grand jury refused to bring charges against Officer Austin, concluding that the officer acted in self-defense.

No national and international reaction and media coverage and activism. No protests. No United Nations intervention. Nobody burnt buildings to the ground for the white teen. And if they had done so, the media would have condemned it.
Now compare a similar shooting death on August 9. Michael Brown, a black unarmed 18-year-old man under the influence of drugs, was shot and killed by Officer Darren Wilson, who is white, in Ferguson.
A St. Louis County grand jury’s decision not to indict the officer ignited violence and looting in Ferguson and days of protests nationwide against “racial injustice.” The black population burnt buildings to the ground for the black teen, as the media watched without condemning it. The United Nations, which did not intervene for the white teen gunned down, intervened for the black teen gunned down.
There were national and international protests.
Why in America does an unarmed black teen killed by a white cop cause outrage and an unarmed white teen killed by a black cop doesn’t?
Should white populations also burn buildings to the ground to drawn media’s attention for the “racism” of black cops who kill unarmed white teens?
No, because the U.S. media has no idolatry for white people.
Years ago Erik Rush, a black Christian author, wrote a relevant book entitled “Negrophilia,” published by WND. Yet, he was too generous. The Ferguson case shows that the problem in America surpasses negrophilia. It is negrolatry and even reverse racism promoted by a negrolatric media.

If white idolatry in the past of America is condemned today, why should modern-day black idolatry be spared?
The color of the offender or of the cop is irrelevant. An offender shot by a cop should be no cause for racial idolatry or ideological opportunism.
Yet, by the will of a negrolatric and ideologically opportunistic media, an offender can be entitled to special treatment, solely because of his skin color. And a sordidly pro-abortion and pro-sodomy individual can be entitled to presidency, solely because of his skin color too.
In today’s America, does skin color matter more than character’s color?
With information of The Washington Times.
Portuguese version of this article: Adolescente branco morto por policial negro e adolescente negro morto por policial branco e as preferências da mídia americana
Source: Last Days Watchman
Recommended Reading:
Nelson Mandela: Israel Is Terrorist and Islamic Arabs Are Innocent

To: tejek who wrote (819802)	11/29/2014 7:45:05 PM
From: joseffy	2 Recommendations Recommended By locogringo TideGlider Respond to of 1586545

NYT Reporter Who Published Darren Wilson Address,...Has Shoplifting Criminal Record ................................................................................ gotnews.com ^ \| 11/29 \| Johnson

To: tejek who wrote (819802)	11/29/2014 8:44:15 PM
From: joseffy	1 Recommendation Recommended By Taro Respond to of 1586545

Snopes...isn't that the site that has always had their nose up Barry Soetoro's behind?

To: tejek who wrote (819802)	11/29/2014 8:51:15 PM
From: joseffy	2 Recommendations Recommended By locogringo Taro Respond to of 1586545

Liberal Snopes Couple OKs Publishing Darren Wilson Address… ....................................................................... November 29, 2014 by Charles C. Johnson gotnews.com The liberal couple behind Snopes defended the New York TImes decision to publish the address of Darren Wilson and his newly pregnant wife. Gotnews.com has decided to publish the couple’s address in response. 25748 DARK CREEK RD CALABASAS, CA 91302-2107 LOS ANGELES COUNTY Barbara and David P. Mikkelson run the controversial website, Snopes.com. It just so happens that they nearly always debunk conservative stories and allow liberal ones to go right through. Here‘s what they wrote: The Times did mention that Wilson and his wife own a house in Crestwood and referenced the street name, but they did not publish the full address; moreover, that information was neither current nor revelatory in nature since (as noted in the same article) the Wilsons had vacated the house months earlier, and that same information had already been widely disseminated back in August 2014 in coverage of the Mike Brown case published major newspapers such as the Washington Post and the Boston Globe. It’s actually far worse to just publish the street that the Wilsons live on. What about their neighbors? Publishing the address and the street name exposes everyone in the neighborhood to potential violence. And so what if they moved out of their property, they still own it. Publishing the address exposes the entire neighborhood to potential firebombing.