Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (176850)	12/2/2014 2:50:37 PM
From: TideGlider	1 Recommendation Recommended By tonto Respond to of 224757

Kenneth try reading the Grand Jury releases and stop copy and paste bullshit to which you are so attracted.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (176850)	12/2/2014 3:31:06 PM
From: longnshort	3 Recommendations Recommended By dave rose locogringo TideGlider Respond to of 224757

they killed and burned the body of the witness who told the truth and said Brown was attacking the officer

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (176850)	12/2/2014 3:55:26 PM
From: tonto	1 Recommendation Recommended By TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224757

A review of thousands of pages of testimony from the case, made public last week, shows that the forensic evidence and some witnesses’ accounts are consistent with Officer Wilson’s explanation of what happened: that he shot Mr. Brown because the teenager was charging forward in a threatening way, and that Mr. Brown’s hands were not raised to the sky, but were at his sides. He also testified that Mr. Brown had one hand in his waistband.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (176850)	12/2/2014 5:01:00 PM
From: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB lorne Respond to of 224757

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (176850)	12/2/2014 6:46:45 PM
From: Jack of All Trades	2 Recommendations Recommended By rayrohn TideGlider Respond to of 224757

Court ruling challenges Obama immigration action watchdog.org \| 12/2/14 \| Kenric Ward Posted on 12/2/2014, 6:39:10 PM by T Ruth WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a ruling that could short-circuit one of President Obama’s executive actions on immigration, a federal court has allowed U.S. tech workers to challenge extensions of foreign laborers’ status here. The case of Washington Alliance of Technology Workers v. the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has “major implications” for the president’s ability to expand the number of work visas and the terms or durations of those visas, said Dale Wilcox, executive director of the Immigration Reform Law Institute. * * * Gene Nelson, a longtime activist for U.S. tech workers’ rights, estimates that downward wage pressures by OPT extensions already cost American STEM employees $175.5 billion in lost earnings. Nelson said the tech-visa programs “have morphed into de-facto government-sanctioned foreign hiring preferences.” U.S. District Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle’s decision came one day after Obama announced plans to expand and extend the OPT program. Foreign students or recent graduates can use student F-1 visas to take jobs through OPT. Employers don’t have to pay them a prevailing wage, and they are exempt from Medicare and Social Security taxes, making OPT workers “inherently cheaper” than U.S. workers, the lawsuit argues. Huvelle ruled that the IT plaintiffs with degrees in computer programming “were in direct and current competition with OPT students on a STEM extension. This competition resulted in concrete and particularized injury.” (Excerpt) Read more at watchdog.org ...