Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zep70 who wrote (8539)	12/6/2014 7:52:38 PM
From: CanadaGrant	2 Recommendations Recommended By minder Nav2006 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10654

The only way someone is going to buy us out is through Teck and after a production decision by Teck. If we are on the shelf, our share of Schaft Creek is worth the land claim (well, 25% of it). Teck is now the operator. They do what they want. If there is no production we are worth nothing as it will have been a ninety million dollar waste of time for every shareholder except for Elmer. He is the only one getting paid for this crap.

To: Zep70 who wrote (8539)	12/6/2014 9:07:42 PM
From: explorationguy	2 Recommendations Recommended By radagast Zep70 Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10654

I'm expecting it to be someone else but not until Teck reveals their plans. No one will buy us out unless there's a good probability the project will be developed just as the share price will not show a decent recovery until that state is reached. Fort Hills has committed capital funding until completion. The next two possible projects are QB2 and Quintette according to Ron Millos(CFO) in the latest audio from the Scotiabank Mining Conference: platformwebcast.com .He said they look at acquisitions but the price expectations from the sellers are not acceptable to Teck. However, Teck will not commit to QB2 until the QB1 permits are in hand and it's been two years waiting. I have no expectations for a buyout or production decision any time soon. What I would like to see soon is a conclusion to the optimization studies(we may get limited results back), a plan to update the FS numbers unless they have already done it(they use in house staff for RE's and reserves) and an announcement that they will file the EA for SC.