SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wayners who wrote (71067)12/9/2014 12:40:22 AM
From: pcstel1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Wayners

  Respond to of 71588
 
<I plan to leave the country forever and renounce one day. I am well aware by history, that if you wait too long, you end up in a Soviet Bloc.<

Yeap! I already have dual citizenship.. When things get ugly, you will be surprised how fast your "friends" doors shut tight.

The Liberals live under this constant fantasy that the "wealthy" can not leave.. No matter how highly you tax them.. This is simply "wishful thinking".. The wealthy already have a plan. They have made contingency plans for nearly every event. Which is why they are wealthy, because they have long term plans which extend past "paycheck to paycheck".

I have a friend whom is a High Net Worth Financial Adviser in NYC. He told me one day that 90% of his clients had dual-citizenship.. With the majority holding Irish passports in addition to US passports.

The Liberals passed around this article by a 1% warning the other 1%'ers that the 99%'ers are coming with pitchforks.

politico.com

ted.com

The Liberals wring their hands at the image of pitchfork wielding mobs coming after the wealthy. They truly embellish the thought.

But, as I have pointed out to them.. This is simply "fantasy". Because the wealthy are far too smart for this to happen. First of all, we take the threat.. Pitchfork wielding mobs.. Well you can't have "Pitchfork Wielding Mobs" without some "pitchforks".. I mean.. Lot's of Pitchforks. So the wealthy look at this potential issue far different than the average Joe. The 99% would look a the potential for the "actual event" of the Pitchfork wielding mobs. But, if you look harder. The Wealthy see the situation completely different. They see it as an opportunity to make money. I mean, if there is going to be mobs of people getting "pitchforks".. Then why not invest in "Pitchfork Manufactures"? This way you can access sales data, and predict when the masses will have enough pitchforks to rise. In the mean time. The Wealthy make a killing on their investment in Ptichfork manufactures. When the masses arrive with their Pitchforks.. The only thing they will find is a Contrail. As the Wealthy Jet off to their country of dual citizenship.. Never having to look back, or return.

In reality, the wealthy didn't "steal the wealth" from the 99%. Rather, the 99% gladly sent their money to the 1%. The Liberals go on and on about the disappearance of the "middle class", and of course they want to blame someone, because, loyal to the Liberal principles they hold so dear. You always blame, "demonize" someone else for your own poor decisions. "Never take "self-responsibility" when it is so much easier to demonize others for your own poor decisions.

Since the mid-1980's, Consumer Revolving Debt has exploded from around 200 Billion to nearly 3.2 Trillion. We are talking "revolving debt".. Not "Mortgage Debt".. Just plain old, can't spend only what I make, so I want to spend what I will make next year debt.

The end result is the largest transfer of wealth from the "middle class" to the 1% ever seen. Estimated to be nearly 7 Trillion dollars since the mid 80's. Just look at the number.. 3.2Trillion in consumer debt. At an average of 16% interest. That is nearly half a TRILLION DOLLARS a year in credit card interest payments.
Money sent every month form the 99% to the 1%.

The 1% did not steal your future, did not steal your retirement, did not steal you money. You sold your future down the drain every time you swiped you credit card so you could "Live for today".

The only problem with living for today.. Is that.. Chances are.. Tomorrow is actually going to come. And when it does, let us not Demonize others for your own poor choices and decisions in life.

And so it goes,
PCSTEL



To: Wayners who wrote (71067)12/16/2014 11:12:11 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71588
 
LOL... I recommend Costa Rica... and when you come crawling back we'll have a 50% of your net worth entry fee... thanks for that!

In the mean time can you dopes tell us a few more times about how the US is the greatest nation on earth and the protector of God and Israel??? Also why we should send troops into Syria, and how great the invasion of Iraq was?? Just so you aren't imposed on... you can reply with the praises of future military actions while having your cocktail on the way to Costa Rica.....

ROFLMAO!!! You guys are SUCH a HOOT!!

DAK



To: Wayners who wrote (71067)2/18/2015 2:52:58 AM
From: greatplains_guy  Respond to of 71588
 
Peeking behind the ‘green’ curtain
Uncovering the Kitzhaber connections

By Chris Horner - - Tuesday, February 17, 2015



This week Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber, a Democrat, leaves office, having resigned under the cloud of a cronyism and corruption scandal. A U.S. attorney has subpoenaed “records that are a catalog of Kitzhaber’s climate and economy-related initiatives,” centering on money given to Mr. Kitzhaber’s fiancee Cylvia Hayes. Ms. Hayes served a curious triple role of “first lady,” adviser to the governor on energy policy and well-compensated consultant for the “clean energy” industry.

Any such investigation must not stop at Oregon’s borders. This is not because the “clean energy” industry seems unique for its associated scandals in recent years, or the prevalence of wealthy Democratic donors getting even richer from it. Of course, some of those same supporters, such as Tom Steyer, provided Democrats a financial surge on a par with a longtime force, the teachers’ unions, in 2014, expressly for the purpose of advancing the “climate” agenda, transferring taxpayer money to uneconomic “clean energy” schemes.

Instead, a broader look into the depth of this ingrained collusion reveals that Mr. Kitzhaber’s office enlisted others to use their governors’ offices to “spread climate coordination and collaboration to a larger group of governors across the U.S.” underwritten by Mr. Steyer and others.

On behalf of the Energy and Environment Legal Institute, I obtained an 11-page email thread under Washington State’s freedom of information law. In it, we see how Mr. Kitzhaber’s office organized a campaign to promote the industry’s agenda, beginning with the California and Washington governors’ offices, a private environmentalist law firm and the White House.

The scheme was to recruit other governors to use their offices the same way. Mr. Kitzhaber’s aide originating the email discussion is Dan Carol, identified as central to the unfolding scandal by the Portland Oregonian: “How did Hayes end up with a fellowship funded by an organization with an interest in clean-energy policy in Oregon? A Kitzhaber campaign adviser, Dan Carol, helped arrange the funding following Kitzhaber’s election in 2010 … Carol subsequently landed a position within the Kitzhaber administration. That position, Willamette Week has reported, pays more than $165,000, making Carol Kitzhaber’s highest-paid aide.”

According to the emails, the parties discuss “Dan’s concept.” Deploying the governors’ offices in a coordinated push for the “climate” agenda would require paying outside parties as well, which would be funded by “major environmental donors” including Michael Bloomberg and Mr. Steyer. This would “serve as a standard setting left flank.”

Specifically, the plan includes “a nationally-coordinated, multi-year ‘states strategy’ focused on driving outcomes contemplated by the president’s climate action plan, [EPA’s Clean Air Act section 111d], resilient infrastructure and international treaty objectives at scale.”

Using green-group slang, the emails refer to President Obama’s push for windmills and solar panels to supplant our existing network of electricity generation and distribution, and to the Kyoto II treaty expected to be reached in December.

The parties sought to arrange a private White House dinner “to create buy-in” among the same crowd, to “signal where funders should support filling holes in missing capacity we need to pull off the Multi-state strategy to keep outcomes and momentum moving on top of the public approach,” wrote Mr. Carol.

According to the emails, Special Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change Dan Utech liked the idea. Sam Ricketts, director of Washington Gov. Jay Inslee’s Washington, D.C. office, also assured his colleagues that “[Council on Environmental Quality ] staff were interested and felt [White House’s David] Agnew, [then-Counselor to the President John] Podesta et al.” would be interested as well.

About the planned White House meeting, they suggested “select Governors, senior White House officials, Tom Steyer, [Michael] Bloomberg, and a couple of other major environmental donors”: “The Ask to Funders at that Meeting: Support right now the hiring of a ‘grown-up’ in each state, trusted and recommended by each engaged Governor who is capable and committed to developing and managing an integrated and multi-issue climate outcomes campaign through Paris 2015.”

This would “be independent of any specific in-state or national [nongovernmental organization], yet would work closely with [green] NGOs .”

A major objective was creating “broad interstate [climate] agreement.” Most intriguing about this was the plan to use electric utilities to flip Republican governors. “[B]ecause there are key utilities whose service territories cross red and blue states Governors in these states could quietly engineer a breakthrough strategy that compels utilities in key red states to lead the charge to win over a key Governor, rather than rely on a standard NGO-shaming strategy that might not deliver.”

Taken together, the Kitzhaber scandal and these emails leave no doubt that credible investigation into the use of public offices to advance the “clean energy” industry, beyond the Oregon governor’s office, is required. Any investigation must also extend to the White House, whose occupant serially invoked the objective of “finally” making renewable energy “the profitable kind of energy.

That is not a legitimate purpose of government. Yet it plainly was an objective of many government officials. We now see both how and why. It is time to investigate what is behind this “fundamental transformation” of government.

Chris Horner is an attorney in Washington D.C. representing various nonpartisan public interest groups.

washingtontimes.com