Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: louel who wrote (8583)	12/7/2014 5:51:45 PM
From: Metacomet	Respond to of 10654

Having a hard time making my point.. Yes to all of those things.. but... There is nothing that would have stopped the negotiation from winding up exactly as it has, even had those factors been determinant, if they had delivered the BFS IAW Salazar There was a reason they gambled with a dodgy strategy like ignoring the contract, in what appears to be a co-ordinated action ..and I think they did it so that CUU would not be able to offer the project package to any other interested party Teck did not want to run the risk of going completely out of title, regardless of how shitty it appears They had no intention of relinquishing that remaining, controlling fraction, regardless of what the BFS showed ..so it was ignored...with CUU's active co-operation