Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zep70 who wrote (8611)	12/7/2014 6:37:15 PM
From: CanadaGrant	1 Recommendation Recommended By Tap66 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10654

I don't really think there is going to be a consolidation or the share price will hit a dime but Mud has been right more than me.

To: Zep70 who wrote (8611)	12/7/2014 6:39:58 PM
From: Metacomet	5 Recommendations Recommended By brundall Hog Head Nav2006 Theotokos Zilyunz Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10654

Your harping on this selling nonsense on what people are recommending is getting old That isn't what is happening If you can't shake off the Kool-Aid stupor, you will simply start being ignored You seem to have an extremely hard time understanding how a balanced discussion works If you think folks are wrong, you challenge their argument, not your imagined "motive" bullshit ..arguments that come out of your ass, based on what you to believe won't make the cut

To: Zep70 who wrote (8611)	12/7/2014 6:54:55 PM
From: mudguy	1 Recommendation Recommended By Theotokos Respond to of 10654

First, I'm not recommending anything. I think I have had to say that a few times. Second, I've taken my share of vilification on these boards from "longs" and I can live with it. To be blunt, they were wrong- completely- so being singled out by that illustrious cohort is no biggie. None of the intricate theories and scenarios were remotely correct. None. I posted on AG for a bit, and a hubleader wrote a hatchet job questioning my motivations. It was mid-2012 and I saw some upside, maybe $2 if things went well (it obviously didn't). It was like shock and awe to suggest such a low number. My motivations were to give an alternative view and help people see what I was seeing. So those who recommended his post as giving one to that a-hole mudguy lost a further dollar/share in their investment for their group-think. I wonder what his motivations were?