SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zax who wrote (821353)12/7/2014 6:55:23 PM
From: Mongo2116  Respond to of 1584048
 
WELL WELL WELL...THE REPUBLITURDS ARE NOT INTERESTED IN facts YA KNOW!!!!



To: zax who wrote (821353)12/7/2014 7:03:00 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1584048
 
Right. Obama "recovery" is great. As long as you don't look at what really counts.



You can NEVER have the kind of productivity we need to grow an economy with what that graph shows since Obama took office. The current month's figures notwithstanding (since they are an anomaly resulting from replacing each full-time job with multiple part-time workers), this is an economic disaster so bad you have to go back to the Carter presidency to find anything similar.



To: zax who wrote (821353)12/7/2014 7:39:54 PM
From: tejek1 Recommendation

Recommended By
zax

  Respond to of 1584048
 
The Obama recovery isn't just a little bit better than the Bush recovery. It's miles better. But here's the interesting thing. This chart looks only at private sector employment. If you want to make Bush look better, you can look at total employment instead. It's still not a great picture, but it's a little better:

I know............the Bush recovery was one of the most anemic since WWII.