SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (822508)12/13/2014 5:00:59 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579732
 
It’s Official: US Funding Al Qaeda and TalibanPosted by Dr Stuart Jeanne Bramhall on August 3, 2013

At Least 43 Reconstruction Contracts Going to Terrorist Groups

by Dr. Stuart Jeanne Bramhall

It’s extremely ironic for the US State Department to be issuing travel alerts for US citizens in the Middle East and North Africa the same week we learn that the Pentagon is contracting with Al Qaeda and Taliban supporters to carry out Afghan reconstruction projects.

Tony Capaccio of Bloomberg News cites a quarterly report to Congress by Special Inspector for Afghan Reconstruction John Sopko.The report reveals Sopko asked the US Army Suspension and Disbarment office to cancel 43 contracts to known Al Qaeda and Taliban supporters. They refused. The reason? The Suspension and Disbarment Office claims it would violate Al Qaeda and Taliban “due process rights.”

Curious, isn’t it? Official terrorist groups have due process rights, but not whistleblowers, Guantanamo detainees, or ordinary Americans subject to continual surveillance by NSA.

The intelligence community has been quietly leaking evidence for more than a decade that the US is secretly funding Al Qaeda to promote political instability (and justify continued military intervention) in the Middle East. In the last two years the CIA has been caught red-handed funding and training Al Qaeda militants in Libyaand Syria.

Based on Sopko’s report, Pentagon support for Al Qaeda and the Taliban is official as of August 1.

Let me see if I can think this through: the Pentagon is giving Al Qaeda and the Taliban funding, even though Al Qaeda and the Taliban are planning to carry out attacks on US citizens. How can this be happening? It would appear the US government is at war with their own people.

The 236 page quarterly report Sopko submitted to Congress also raises grave concerns about Obama’s request for $10.7 billion in 2014 for Afghan reconstruction projects. All would be carrying out by civilian contractors, of which 30-40% would be local Afghan businesses.

Sopko argues the Pentagon already fails abysmally in monitoring an existing $32 million program to install bars or gratings in culverts to prevent insurgents from planting roadside bombs in them. He thinks at bare minimum the Department of Defense should now how many contracts they have issued under this program. They don’t. Thus it seems pretty obvious they aren’t vetting the contractors, much less monitoring where the money is going.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (822508)12/13/2014 5:04:01 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579732
 
is this plain enough for you?
+++

US Funded/Published Textbooks Promoting Jihad Are Still Being Used by Taliban Today
December 8, 2014

In the late 1970s, Afghanistan went through a period of political upheaval – exacerbated by the global chess game being played between the Soviet Union and the United States during the Cold War.

In 1975, a group of militants from the Jamiat Islami party attempted to overthrow the government. Though the attempt was unsuccessful, support for the Islamist party continued to grow.

In April of 1978, Mir Akbar Khyber – a well-known Afghan intellectual and leader of a major faction of the People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan (the ruling party at the time) – was assassinated at his home.

The government blamed his assassination on Islamist factions within the country, but Nur Muhammad Taraki – a notable communist politician – accused the Afghan government of carrying out the assassination themselves.

Using Kyhber’s death as a rallying cry, Taraki was able to lead a successful revolution, after which he established the communist Democratic Republic of Afghanistan.

May 6, 1978: Nur Mohammad Taraki, chairman of the Revolutionary Council and General Secretary of the ruling People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan, gives a speech at a press conference (Photo Credit: Kapoor Baldev/Sygma/Corbis)

Taraki’s new regime was a repressive one – tens of thousands of prisoners and political dissidents were “ disappeared” (most likely executed) during his first year in power, prompting large swaths of the country to go into open rebellion against the new government.

As the pressure built, Taraki reached out to the Soviet Union for help. In December of 1979, the Soviet Army answered that call, sending Soviet troops into Afghanistan to help support Taraki’s regime.

Fearing the spread of communism into the Middle East, the United States, along with allies in the UK, Saudi Arabia and a number of other countries, decided to back a coalition of multi-national insurgent groups called the Mujahideen.

The Mujahideen – comprised of Muslim fighters from Pakistan, Iran and other Islamic nations – was the main group fighting against the Soviet-backed Afghan forces.

For 10 years, the Mujahideen waged a successful guerilla campaign that proved extremely costly for the Soviet Union, both financially and in terms of human life. Finally, in February of 1989, Soviet forces pulled out of Afghanistan.

August 1985: Mujahideen fighters crossing into Afghanistan from the Pakistani border (Photo Credit: Erwin Franzen/Wikimedia Commons)

Throughout the war’s duration, the US provided training, intel and hundreds of millions of dollars in funding to the Mujahideen under Operation Cyclone.

The operation was one of the longest and most costly covert CIA operations in US history. Cyclone’s budget started at $20-30 million in 1980, and rose as high as $630 million in 1987.

But while the CIA was spending vast sums supporting the Mujahideen directly, the United States government decided that it needed to be fighting the influence of communism in another arena as well: education.

In the 1980s and early 1990s, the United States commissioned a series of textbooks that promoted violence in the form of jihad against the Soviet invaders.

One notable example is “The Alphabet of Jihad Literacy”, a textbook funded by the US and published by the University of Nebraska at Omaha. From Al-Jazeera:

The majority of the book’s 41 lessons glorify violence in the name of religion. “My uncle has a gun,” reads the entry for the letter T, using the Pashto word for “gun,” “topak.” “He does jihad with the gun.”

The entry for the letter K reads,

“Kabul is the capital of our dear country. No one can invade our country. Only Muslim Afghans can rule over this country.”

“Our religion is Islam. Muhammad is our leader. All the Russians and infidels are our enemy,”




reads another section.

Afghani children studying in Kandahar, the city that served as the Taliban government’s capital until they were unseated by the U.S.-led invasion in 2001 (Photo Credit: Heath Druzin/Stars and Stripes)

With the help of the CIA and Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) distributed “The Alphabet of Jihad Literacy” and other textbooks containing content written by Mujahideen groups to children at refugee camps in Pakistan during the decade-long Soviet war in Afghanistan.

The revelations were made by New York University professor Dana Burde in her newly published book entitled “ Schools for Conflict or for Peace in Afghanistan“. As part of her research, Burde spent more than a decade in Afghanistan and Pakistan, studying the education systems in the two countries.

While US efforts were eventually successful in driving the Soviet army out of Afghanistan, Burde says the pro-jihadist textbooks have spawned countless copies and revised editions, some of which are still being used by the Taliban to indoctrinate young children today.

Only now, the “infidels” referenced in the textbooks undoubtedly include the United States.

Burde says the books are easily repurposed to vilify the US and NATO forces. In fact, during the course of her research, she discovered that the Taliban actually insist that the books be used in schools located in areas that they control.

Students sit on the floor in the remains of a school in Pakistan that was allegedly destroyed by Taliban militants (Photo Credit: AP Photo/B.K.Bangash)

In recent years however, US education funding in Afghanistan has been aimed primarily at increasing stability in Afghan communities and legitimizing the NATO-backed central government in Kabul.

Since the fall of the Taliban, the US has invested more than $880 million on education in Afghanistan. But despite its honorable purposes, Burde believes this funding may have actuallyincreased division and animosity within the country.

According to her research, the majority of this recent education funding has been spent in Pashtun areas at the heart of the insurgency, ignoring Afghanis living in more peaceful parts of the country.

Burde believes that this uneven distribution of aid has led to increased resentment towards foreigners and the central government in Kabul, saying,

“If people perceive that their enemy is getting more of those services, then that could contribute to the underlying conditions for conflict.”



Foreign intervention is a risky and delicate process. Many people believe that investing in the development and education of a country will automatically lead to increased peace, but the reality can be quite the opposite if that investment isn’t spent in the right way.

Burde’s revelations also illustrate how short-term solutions can often contribute to bigger, more long-term problems: the United States is currently fighting against a radical jihadist ideology that it helped to indoctrinate with its textbook initiative just a few decades ago.