SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (822692)12/14/2014 4:22:16 PM
From: locogringo2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
John

  Respond to of 1579131
 
Oh, how is the whole "the glaciers in Antarctica are increasing and not decreasing" working out for you?

It's working out pretty good. Do you have FACTS or LINKS that PROVE otherwise?

(verifiable and legitimate sources............not late night tv comedians...........please)



To: combjelly who wrote (822692)12/14/2014 5:57:04 PM
From: PKRBKR  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579131
 
Y'all still haven't come up with a mechanism why raising the CO2 level would have that effect. It just boggles the imagination

Fixed



To: combjelly who wrote (822692)12/15/2014 4:15:10 AM
From: Taro2 Recommendations

Recommended By
D.Austin
FJB

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1579131
 
Oh, how is the whole "the glaciers in Antarctica are increasing and not decreasing" working out for you?

Sure you overlooked the most recent surprise: First 3D pix made of the Antarctic ice from below by an unmanned robot sub reveals the I've being a lot thicker than so far believed.

While not enough pix have been made from a significant amount of different locations to conclude, that this would be the case all over, it seems to confirm what the Antarctic ice growing camp have been claiming for a long time.



To: combjelly who wrote (822692)12/15/2014 4:20:25 AM
From: Taro1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1579131
 
You still haven't come up with a mechanism, why so far, during the previous (not man made...) global warming periods on record, the CO2 peak always tracked the heating peak significantly - by aro 800 years actually - and not the other way around.

But just go on ignoring the facts, a liberal disease by all means, when facts on hand don't support your ideas about how you believe matters should be.

/Taro