Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : NETZ - gets deal with DEC! future 100 bagger? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: insider who wrote (1353)	12/17/1997 1:43:00 AM
From: DGMAC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1702

Please explain further. DGMAC

To: insider who wrote (1353)	12/17/1997 1:52:00 AM
From: TraderGreg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1702

<1. MM's can short as much stock as they want without "borrowing" certificates. They are not borrowing anyone's stock to short.> Then does that mean they never have to cover? If that were true, then why do MMs switch from the offer to the bid and cover. And how did RMIL temporarily squeeze 'em before tanking. If I understand you, you're saying that an MM can pick a random 4 letter BB stock and say I will short it and never, ever, have to cover. And of course, there are no legal/regulatory issues to consider? I have a problem believing that. Please elaborate. TG