Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Graystone who wrote (7418)	12/17/1997 9:19:00 AM
From: Larry Macklin	Respond to of 20681

Graystone could you please tell me what financial stake you have in naxos. will you benefit financially if naxos stock goes to zero. thank you larry macklin

To: Graystone who wrote (7418)	12/18/1997 3:04:00 AM
From: Graystone	Respond to of 20681

Small Concerns or Say What Anyone who reads my posts knows I like to clip. It is a weasel proof method of pointing out facts. The context is always mine, I am clipping. A case in point is Austin Sherwood Lett, I will presume that he is the real McCoy (McCoy was a rum-runner during the temperance era, his well selected cargoes of illicit booze were never tampered with and very well received, hence to this day we use the expression the Real McCoy) and read his first message. From Austin Lett 207.183.153.206 "When I met Al Johnson and spent some time with him, I knew my journey was over. I had found the man with the answer. It had taken him seventeen years of research to understand the nature of the Franklin Lake-like ore and to create a method for processing it so that it could be assayed using standard techniques and so that it could be commercially separated." So I read this and see a man who has a process that isn't even developed for Franklin Lake, it apparently works on anything that can be called Franklin Lake-like, in fact, when you read Austin Letts next post, he confirms my suspicion. Apparently Johnson has never even been there. From Austin Lett 207.183.153.206 "2) Naxos wished to introduce Dr. Johnson to management, to shareholers, and to investors and to show him the FL property." It really bothers me that in the above statement we see Dr. Johnson being introduced to management and shareholders by NAXOF, how does that work, who is NAXOF if not the management and shareholders, Mr. Letts perception seems to be that Naxos is something or someone other than management and shareholders. Of course I am interested in Johnsons professional associations, who has passed up this opportunity to exploit Dr. Johnsons process which works on any Franklin Lake-like ore. Does he have any professional associations with Merwin White, I know Mr. Lett does. When did NAXOF give up thier "proprietary process" in favor of Johnsons process. In the event that commercial production is not possible, do we get our money back ??? NAXOF has every characteristic needed to make any investor RUN. Mr. Lett claims to be aboveboard but his name appears in connection with some very dubious characters, it is his name, his imprimatur I see when I go view the $427,000,000.00 offer. I have the material returned when you send away for that offer you know, you should get it too. If you have been reading my posts it should be fairly obvious we are still at point A, 1997 has been a banner year for NAXOF. Merwin White methodology certified by Ledoux, we have the gold, DELGF is a scam, White Labratories is fingered (Merwin White's lab), our certification is of course still fine. NAXOF whines to ASE Date: July 23, 1997 Despite this statement and the positive results achieved at Ledoux and Company not only in the month of October 1996, but throughout 1997, the ASE never acknowledged nor approved Naxos' methodology. Say what, who's methodology are they referring to in the above statement.