Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rawnoc who wrote (30)	12/19/2014 11:57:25 AM
From: drkaz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 326

"Think about it -- if anybody tried to say "NNVC has no drugs in any stage of development" that anybody would expect a parade of longs to correct him. So what would be the point?" IMO - that would be the point - to generate controversy. And since the initial "there is no pipeline" statement on iHub was made directly following and exchange about an extensive post describing exactly what the "pipeline" was (and was not) - one could see what that conclusion on the part of longs might be jumped to. And - since I have enough experience reading NewMoney's posts - I think that I know he/she is subtile enough to know the difference in those terms. Point corrected. Point resolved. Moving on now.

To: Rawnoc who wrote (30)	12/19/2014 11:49:18 PM
From: NewMoney_812	1 Recommendation Recommended By Rawnoc Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 326

Everyone knows I'm you. I think my ability to misuse words as NewMoney that I never misuse as Rawnoc is a testament to my acting skills. What Newmoney was trying to say is that in his opinion there's nothing in the pipeline because he doesn't think this technology works. If it doesn't work for one virus it won't work for any virus. If it doesn't work there ain't shit it the pipeline. That's Newmoney's opinion, I've known him for years.