Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (823748)	12/19/2014 4:42:52 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576310

Sorry, but disapproving of incest isn't racist. I wonder why you are so sensitive on this issue? I posted this: You're saying this is a lie? How do you know it's a lie? If incest becomes legal and you don't support it, prepare to be called 'bigots' by the people who will jump on the band wagon; just like with homosexuality. Could you imagine? "You Christian bigots should stay out of me and my sister's bedroom! We are happy and in love"... I'd say your eagerness to denounce me for this post actually confirms my point. ------------------------------ "the Democratic party in the south was monolithically segregationist" They all became R's over the last 40 years. No, they didn't. Al Gore and his Dad stayed Democrats. So did Jimmy Carter, who got his start as a segregationist on his local school board. So did Bill Clinton and his political mentor, J William Fulbright. So did Sam Ervin, beloved Watergate committee member. So did Kluxer Robert Byrd. It was the Democrats move to the left that lost them the south.