Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: explorationguy who wrote (8803)	12/20/2014 3:49:07 PM
From: Metacomet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10654

So most of our 90 million was spent, not pursuing the requirements of a mine as defined in Salazar, but merely doing fieldwork for the eventual developer of Schaft Creek? ..and since we now know that was always going to be Teck, regardless of the contract that said we would earn the entire project (subject to arms length back-in rights) ..is it not safe to state that Elmer spent our investment, not to benefit his shareholders, but to do advance work for the benefit of Teck...for some reason unclear to us Or is there some other way to explain what happened up there?