SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (824884)12/22/2014 7:33:09 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578900
 
Who's to say? That's why they don't show their faces.

Ever since the lid was blown off the FBI’s COINTELPRO activities in the 1970s, the tactics of infiltration, disruption and “neutralization” have become well known to civil liberties advocates everywhere. At the local level, civil rights lawsuits took on police departments’ use of specialized “ red squads” that used similar tactics. A federal district court ruling from 1972 describes allegations put forth by plaintiffs suing the NYPD:

Informers and infiltrators provoked, solicited and induced members of lawful political and social groups to engage in unlawful activities. In the instance of infiltrating police officers, it is alleged that in addition to urging members to participate in unlawful activity, they provided funds and equipment to further that purpose. Specific instances of such conduct are cited, including the alleged inducement of members of named organizations, to which some plaintiffs belong, to participate in armed robbery, with resulting arrests, indictments and trials upon the charges, ending in acquittals, and upon another occasion to plan the bombing of a government facility ( Handschu v. Special Services Division, US District Court for SDNY, 24 October 1972).



ceinquiry.wordpress.com