Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: drkaz who wrote (59)	12/24/2014 10:17:24 PM
From: Rawnoc	Respond to of 326

To be fair, you do make a very valid point. These are just message boards and for all we know you are a secret billionaire. You don't lay all your cards on the table and we have no idea how successful you are or how you process information. I wouldn't be surprised, for example, if you go through every negative with a fine-toothed comb but don't want to express it in public either for strategic reasons, you don't feel like sharing it, or that's not the purpose. Sometimes we use boards to vent, to laugh, to cry, to show joy -- it's rarely to never a complete picture of our thoughts. I can't tell you how many times, for example, I'll be in a stock with a group of very happy-seeming posters then we get on a conference call chat and you hear anger, screaming, and rage about the FDA or an earnings report or the latest app a tech company designed or whatever. Then there is vice versa -- so often people will rage on the boards and then on the phone and/or off the boards they say they were just ranting but are still very excited about the future and buying. The boards are mostly just social media IMO with sprinkles of some real info slipped in at times to make it all worth it. On that note, I've found most people I meet in person almost nothing like they seem on the boards. Same when I talk to them on the phone. So, yeah, we probably misjudged you and others a lot but your willingness to go against the grain once in a while I think may reveal your true, less-biased-as-you-might-seem self. Hell, you were willing to play my contest so you can't be all that bad. ;) Merry Xmas to you!

To: drkaz who wrote (59)	12/26/2014 3:27:46 AM
From: NewMoney_812	1 Recommendation Recommended By Rawnoc Respond to of 326

Sorry, I didn't mean to suggest you weren't already successful. Why do you think the company has gone silent lately? That bothers me because they have gone silent before. Like the failure to explain why years have passed since flucide should have finished phase III trials with no results. That would be the cash cow here and we don't know why it failed to produce adequate results, we can only assume that it has failed since they haven't told us it passed. That should have been 2009 or 2010 according to timelines suggested by the company back then.

To: drkaz who wrote (59)	12/29/2014 1:33:43 PM
From: Rawnoc	Respond to of 326

Sure looks quite active to me: clinicaltrials.gov

To: drkaz who wrote (59)	12/29/2014 1:34:33 PM
From: Rawnoc	Respond to of 326

September 9, 2014: ansunbiopharma.com

To: drkaz who wrote (59)	12/31/2014 4:22:34 PM
From: Rawnoc	Respond to of 326

HUGE CONGRATULATIONS TO DRKAZMD65 FOR WINNING THE CONTEST CONTEST CLOSED--FINAL ENTRIES FOR 2014'S CLOSE: NNVC CONTEST---GUESS THE 2014 CLOSE---NEW PRIZE!!!! Rules: If there is a tie, the winner is whoever picked the lower stock price. Winner gets bragging rights (but please no attacking others who lost as this is just for fun) and also gets to pick TWO guesses in the next contest, giving him or her a little edge. 2.49 Rawnoc 2.55 NewMoney 2.80 drkazmd65 2.85 zeptepi 2.87 kulnor 2.99 FORZANANO 3.04 loanranger 3.15 Aspenmp 3.19 Deep6 3.20 JG36 3.36 arvitar 3.52 rearden