SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (826092)12/27/2014 1:45:17 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1583677
 
The Nearly Instant Reaction From Bystanders After Texas Officer Kills Gun-Wielding Suspect: Report

Dec. 26, 2014 10:31pm Jason Howerton

A police officer in Texas City, Texas, fatally shot a gun-wielding suspect after he allegedly pointed a gun at the officer outside a bar. Reacting to the shooting, some of the more than 100 bystanders who flooded the scene allegedly threw bottles and other objects at police officers, the Houston Chronicle reports.

The officer involved in the shooting responded to a call from the manager of H.T.’s Lounge in Texas City at around 1 a.m. early Friday, and when he arrived on the scene, he reportedly witnessed the suspect firing a handgun at people leaving the front door of the bar.

At one point, the officer said the suspect pointed his gun at him, forcing him to open fire.


Screengrab via KTRK-TV

The bar’s owner, Harris Aldridge, reportedly reviewed surveillance footage of the incident and confirmed the suspect moved toward the cop with a firearm. Family members have apparently identified the deceased man as 20-year-old Carlton Smith.

“The decision was to turn towards the officer and point his handgun at the officer,” Texas City Police Chief Robert Burby said, according to KTRK-TV. “The officer then fired his weapon, striking the deceased.”

However, the Chronicle reports some of the bystanders allegedly hurled bottles and other objects at the police as they worked the scene of the officer-involved shooting, according to the accounts of officers.

More from KTRK-TV:

[iframe width="600" height="315" src="http://abc13.com/video/embed/?pid=451017" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""][/iframe]

Critics quickly compared the shooting to the Michael Brown case in Ferguson, Missouri, and offered conflicting testimony.

“This brother was assassinated,”
King Yashua , minister of defense and co-founder of the Nation of Liberation, told the Houston Chronicle. “It’s just like Ferguson.”

Texas City police spokesman Sgt. Joe Stanton called on the community for an “opportunity to get to the truth.” Stranton also said there were no reported injuries as a result of the alleged bottle and rock throwing.

Though tensions are high across the nation due to other police killings, the shooting fatality is the first by a police officer in Texas City in more than a decade.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/12/26/the-instant-reaction-from-over-100-bystanders-after-texas-officer-kills-gun-wielding-suspect



To: tejek who wrote (826092)12/27/2014 1:47:28 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1583677
 
How Much Should We Tolerate?

John Hawkins | Dec 27, 2014

Here’s a message that’s almost never said that our country desperately needs to hear: Americans need to be a lot less tolerant.

One of the most ironclad laws of life on Planet Earth is that you get more of what you reward and less of what you punish. If our goal were to encourage the destruction of our entire society, would what we celebrate and punish culturally be much different?

Maybe it would be a LITTLE different. Movies like the Passion of the Christ and its inferior cousin, Exodus: Gods and Kings, wouldn’t be made. There wouldn’t be anybody celebrating the military and shows like Duck Dynasty wouldn’t be allowed, but most of what we celebrate culturally these days wouldn’t need to change at all. If the whole country bought into the values being pushed by most of Hollywood, MSNBC and on Lena Dunham’s twitter account, we’d be a banana republic before Chelsea Clinton could take on Jenna Bush for the presidency in 2040.

That hasn’t always been the case. There was a time when American culture trumpeted the values that made us successful, which most assuredly were not tolerance, diversity and being nice to each other. Not that any of those values are bad. Let me repeat that: NOT THAT ANY OF THOSE VALUES ARE BAD, but they’re also not very important in the scheme of things either. You can exemplify all of those values and still be a completely immoral, lazy weirdo whose existence is a drag on the rest of society.

Yet, we don’t want to say that because it has been hammered into us that it’s so essential to be “tolerant.” When I think of tolerance on a society-wide level, a story Mark Steyn once wrote about always comes to mind.

“Once upon a time we knew what to do. A British district officer, coming upon a scene of suttee, was told by the locals that in Hindu culture it was the custom to cremate a widow on her husband’s funeral pyre. He replied that in British culture it was the custom to hang chaps who did that sort of thing. There are many great things about India — curry, pyjamas, sitars, software engineers — but suttee was not one of them. What a pity we’re no longer capable of being 'judgmental' and 'discriminating.'"

How many people are there who wouldn’t want their kids on drugs, who wouldn’t want anyone on drugs living in their neighborhood, who wouldn’t hire someone who regularly uses drugs – but are okay with drug legalization and are cheerleading marijuana legalization in Colorado because of tolerance?

What about Christians who are okay with Satanists putting up Christmas displays, newspapers slurring Christianity and atheists putting up billboards attacking their faith?

Then there are the people who want the police to be tough on crime and keep criminals out of their neighborhoods who are turning a blind eye to protesters who are cheering the death of cops, blocking traffic and generally encouraging lawlessness.

We also can’t forget about the Americans who are simultaneously complaining about the lousy job market (and, yes, it is lousy when there are less people working today than there were when Obama was elected), yet are refusing to deport illegal aliens or halt legal immigration until the job market improves.

Tolerance doesn’t have to be a synonym for stupid, but it is for too many people – and the further down the rabbit hole you go, the worse it gets.

Seung-Hui Cho, who killed 32 people at Virginia Tech, had once written a school report about wanting to “repeat Columbine” and was removed from class for being dangerous, but nobody took any action until it was too late. Ismaaiyl Brinsley actually boasted on social media that he intended to kill police officers before he murdered two NYPD officers. Nidal Hassan was openly calling himself a “soldier of Allah” and reaching out to Al-Qaeda before he murdered 13 soldiers at Fort Hood.

Know why nothing was done in any of those cases?

Because Americans are obsessed with tolerance. We turn a blind eye to every ignorant, foolish, obnoxious and unhealthy behavior you can imagine all in the name of tolerance.

Americans would rather be falsely smeared as racist, have their religion insulted, have their children’s minds poisoned with garbage and see their country go down the tubes than be thought of as intolerant. We’ve become so tolerant that we’re destroying ourselves. We’ve got people openly siding against our country in wars. We’re defending traitors who publicly release our national security secrets. Protesters are walking down the street with police protection while they chant for dead cops.

How about a little less tolerance and a little more common sense? How about we start being less worried about being “fair” to people behaving badly and a little more worried about those being hurt by those behaving badly? You may have heard someone say, “The Constitution is not a suicide pact.” Well, in a time when tolerance has come to mean that you have to embrace lawlessness, encourage cop killers and celebrate degeneracy, then it’s time to accept that tolerance isn’t a suicide pact either.

http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2014/12/27/how-much-should-we-tolerate-n1936093/page/full