Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: explorationguy who wrote (8976)	1/2/2015 2:04:08 PM
From: brundall	2 Recommendations Recommended By Hog Head Metacomet Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10654

It's possible CUU management felt we didn't have the negotiating position the Pre-FS type of results would have supported, and chose to get what they could from Teck That could be true if we didn't have a legally binding contract written by Teck itself.....the fact that we did have such a contract negates any kind of weak negotiating position argument....we earned 100% of Schaft creek, all those lovely Liard shares and $360 million worth of mine improvements. For some reason, that has never been disclosed, we didn't pull the trigger and deliver the notice. Only CUU management, Teck and the Liard board of directors know why.