SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hog Head who wrote (8980)1/2/2015 3:33:23 PM
From: explorationguy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10654
 
We met the size in (ii) but not the 12% in (i). Then a decision was up to Teck to make a call "...in its sole discretion..". It really requires a legal opinion to know where the contract conditions stood. Here's the relevant section:




To: Hog Head who wrote (8980)1/2/2015 3:40:17 PM
From: Metacomet  Respond to of 10654
 
If we didn't meet it - how could CF have stated they have a positive BFS in the cover letter for the report?

They didn't

It was stated by independent 3rd party Tetra-Tech in the introduction to the BFS itself, and the language was approved by all parties, including Teck

..see paragraph 1.1 on page 28

copperfoxmetals.com