SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sense who wrote (9010)1/4/2015 6:15:16 AM
From: Metacomet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10654
 
Most people who piss away $90 million of others money might expect it will cost them their jobs ?

..and given the fact that a whole lot of that was courtesy of 1 person, you have to wonder why they still appear to function as a team..

more smoke...maybe there is a fire..



To: sense who wrote (9010)1/4/2015 7:44:24 AM
From: Theotokos1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Hog Head

  Respond to of 10654
 
Thank you for posting that article Sense. Best read I've had in a long time.



To: sense who wrote (9010)1/4/2015 8:57:55 AM
From: mudguy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10654
 
Correct me if I am wrong, is CUU using the same firm that did the SC PFS for the VD reports?



To: sense who wrote (9010)1/4/2015 11:54:00 AM
From: explorationguy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
dsikorsk

  Respond to of 10654
 
A very good reference article to add to my collection. The section on optimization is very applicable here. That's why I think Teck will reduce the size of the project to cut capital costs, if the economics can be improved. Teck is well aware of the red flags and SC is in their hands now.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News