Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (827601)	1/4/2015 9:29:27 PM
From: Sdgla	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576891

Goddard is factually accurate and Im in the 2015 hall of fame... read it and weep ! Message 29879232

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (827601)	1/5/2015 7:17:55 AM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576891

I told everyone you didn't want people to believe their own eyes: NASA Rewriting The Past To Suit The Needs Of Their Climate Agenda Posted on January 4, 2015 by stevengoddard In 1981, NASA showed the 1930’s as the warmest decade globally. http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1981/1981_Hansen_etal_1.pdf That didn’t suit the global warming narrative, so by 1999 they had almost erased the warm 1930’s The graph below is fraudulent ... just compare it to the one above. Rat doesn't want you to believe your eyes. http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/hansen_07/ However, the small bit of warming from 1940 to 2000 didn’t suit the needs of the Hockey Stick, so NASA has since completely erased the warm 1930’s The graph below is even more fraudulent. Once they started to lie, they had to continue to tell bigger and bigger lies. Rat says you're a liar if you believe what you see. http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/Fig.A.gif The animation below shows the changes NASA made to the global surface temperature record between 1981 and 1999, and then from 1981 to 2014. From: Tom Wigley <wigley@ucar.edu> To: Phil Jones <p.jones@uea.ac.uk> Subject: 1940s Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:38 -0600 Cc: Ben Santer <santer1@llnl.gov> It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with “why the blip”. di2.nu/foia/1254108338.txt