Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (828128)	1/7/2015 7:26:30 AM
From: Mongo2116	Respond to of 1575535

he maybe knows providing FACTS to right wing clowns is futile!!

To: Bill who wrote (828128)	1/7/2015 12:57:30 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575535

Extreme weather can be defined in a number of ways. The simplest is to just count up the number of record weather events. Temperature highs and lows, drought days, rainfall records, etc. And yeah, they are more common. theguardian.com As to the hurricanes, that was answered. If you mean cyclones, yeah there are more of them. And when they do develop, they tend to be more powerful. To the point that there is talk of extending the categories. One to five just isn't as useful any more. If you want the narrow definition of a hurricane as a cyclonic storm off the east coast of the US, those numbers have held steady or even decreased. Some posters have been dancing in the aisles over the latter, nitwit definition. It is a nitwit definition because whether or not the US gets hit is dependent on a number of factors that isn't related to the number of storms. There are years with relatively few storms, but a large percentage makes landfall, and years where the converse is true.