SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (828597)1/8/2015 3:43:42 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574849
 
Tenchu, in case you haven't noticed, we have a global oil glut. Mainly because of our production. So your use of the "secure our energy needs" is just as meaningless as touting its job creation ability.

If the only positives for this thing are hollow phrases, why is there such a push for it?

Ever wonder about that?

I personally have no problem with the pipeline. I gather it is going to be exported anyway, but what the heck. I wish the Canadians would leave it in the ground. The stuff needs to be heated with water when it is mined and then mixed with lighter fraction hydrocarbons to get it to flow because it is essentially asphalt and not oil. So it is expensive and environmentally dangerous, but it is the Canadians call on that.

But it doesn't increase our energy security or create many jobs. Unlike the stimulus which was actually useful.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (828597)1/8/2015 6:48:48 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574849
 
It's funny how you guys were all for "job creation" during the whole "stimulus" nonsense, but not for long-term projects that actually secures our energy needs.

Damn it, techtard, the proposed pipeline is redundant.......all it does is get the oil faster to the Gulf. It does nothing to secure our energy needs further except in the fertile imaginations of wingers.